Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence vs Approval Path for Jira

Approval Path for Jira edges out Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing entry tiers: Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence at From $0/yr, Approval Path for Jira at From $1/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence has the larger user base (153 reviews vs 25), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Approval Path for Jira's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Approval Path for Jira; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence's 153-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Approval Path for Jira's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Read each app's audit: Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence audit • Approval Path for Jira audit

• Browse the atlassian compare hub
• Browse all atlassian apps
• Compare metrics glossary