ScriptRunner for Jira vs Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence

Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence edges out ScriptRunner for Jira on rating (4.8★ vs 4.6★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

Pricing entry tiers: Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence at From $0/yr, ScriptRunner for Jira at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

ScriptRunner for Jira has the larger user base (826 reviews vs 155), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — ScriptRunner for Jira's 826-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence or ScriptRunner for Jira cheaper?

Both Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence and ScriptRunner for Jira offer paid plans only. Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence starts at From $0/yr; ScriptRunner for Jira starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence or ScriptRunner for Jira?

Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 155 reviews) compared to ScriptRunner for Jira (4.6★ from 826 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence or ScriptRunner for Jira?

Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence or ScriptRunner for Jira?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. ScriptRunner for Jira has the deeper published review base (826 vs 155), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?