Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM vs Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence

Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence edges out Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM on rating (4.8★ vs 4.5★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

Pricing entry tiers: Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM at From $1/yr, Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the larger user base (408 reviews vs 154), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM's 408-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM or Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence cheaper?

Both Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence offer paid plans only. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM starts at From $1/yr; Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM or Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence?

Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 154 reviews) compared to Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM (4.5★ from 408 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM or Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence?

Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM or Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the deeper published review base (408 vs 154), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.