Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Gliffy is the secure, intuitive technical diagramming tool fully integrated in Confluence. We're an Atlassian Platinum Top Vendor with over 18 million users—more than any other diagramming app in the Marketplace. Find out why with a free trial.
| Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence | Parameterized Builds for Jenkins (Deprecated) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
You can link multiple Jenkins instances and jobs to a Bitbucket repository, each with custom parameters and triggers. Jobs can be triggered via a manual "Build in Jenkins" button, pushing, deleting, or based on pull request events.
| Metric | Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence | Parameterized Builds for Jenkins (Deprecated) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 ★ | ★ 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 799 | 25 |
| Active installs | 16,258+ | 345+ |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | Free |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | — |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Parameterized Builds for Jenkins (Deprecated) edges out Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence on rating (4.7★ vs 4.5★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, Parameterized Builds for Jenkins (Deprecated) offers a free tier (Free) while Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence starts at From $0/yr. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence has the larger user base (799 reviews vs 25), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Parameterized Builds for Jenkins (Deprecated)'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Parameterized Builds for Jenkins (Deprecated); mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence's 799-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Parameterized Builds for Jenkins (Deprecated)'s broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence audit • Parameterized Builds for Jenkins (Deprecated) audit
| Keyword | Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence | Parameterized Builds for Jenkins (Deprecated) |
|---|---|---|
| forms | Not ranked | #364 |
| form | Not ranked | #478 |
Parameterized Builds for Jenkins (Deprecated) is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence starts at From $0/yr. Both publish their pricing on the Atlassian Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Parameterized Builds for Jenkins (Deprecated) has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 25 reviews) compared to Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence (4.5★ from 799 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Parameterized Builds for Jenkins (Deprecated) holds the higher average rating (4.7★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence has the deeper published review base (799 vs 25), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (799 reviews). Parameterized Builds for Jenkins (Deprecated) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (25 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence and Parameterized Builds for Jenkins (Deprecated) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Parameterized Builds for Jenkins (Deprecated)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.