Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence vs Power Database Fields

Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence and Power Database Fields are evenly matched on rating (4.5★ vs 4.5★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.

Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence has the larger user base (799 reviews vs 59), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Power Database Fields's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most teams the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Which has better reviews, Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence or Power Database Fields?

Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence (4.5★, 799 reviews) and Power Database Fields (4.5★, 59 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.

Should I choose Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence or Power Database Fields?

AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 4.5★. Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence does carry the larger published review base (799 vs 59). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence or Power Database Fields?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence has the deeper published review base (799 vs 59), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (799 reviews). Power Database Fields typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (59 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence and Power Database Fields?

Migration support varies by app and category. Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence and Power Database Fields both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Power Database Fields" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.