Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Manage, reuse, and automate tests across projects—all inside Jira. Align teams and catch defects quickly with AI-powered, no-code automation. Gain full visibility with seamless test execution, cross-project sharing, and built-in reporting.
| Zephyr - Test Management and Automation for Jira | Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated |
Industry professionals leverage Tempo Planner as a centralized workspace to plan current and future work. With Tempo Planner, customers are able to allocate resources towards high-impact initiatives, while ensuring their team's workload is realistic.
| Metric | Zephyr - Test Management and Automation for Jira | Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.1 ★ | 3.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 492 | 200 |
| Active installs | 17,823+ | 10,276+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $1/yr | From $1/yr |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Featured placements | 1 | — |
Based on the data on this page, Zephyr - Test Management and Automation for Jira is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace merchants — 4.1★ vs Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo's 3.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing sits in similar territory: Zephyr - Test Management and Automation for Jira at From $1/yr, Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo at From $1/yr (within ~25% of each other on the entry tier). At this overlap, total cost of ownership comes from how per-tier capacity gates align with your order volume — confirm both apps' upgrade triggers against your projected scale before deciding. Zephyr - Test Management and Automation for Jira has the larger user base (492 reviews vs 200), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Zephyr - Test Management and Automation for Jira; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo's 200-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Zephyr - Test Management and Automation for Jira's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Zephyr - Test Management and Automation for Jira audit • Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo audit
| — |
Not featured in any section recently.
Both Zephyr - Test Management and Automation for Jira and Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo offer paid plans only. Zephyr - Test Management and Automation for Jira starts at From $1/yr; Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo starts at From $1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Zephyr - Test Management and Automation for Jira has the higher average rating (4.1★ from 492 reviews) compared to Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo (3.7★ from 200 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Zephyr - Test Management and Automation for Jira fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace marketplace. Zephyr - Test Management and Automation for Jira has more onboarding documentation maturity (492 reviews vs 200), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Zephyr - Test Management and Automation for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (492 reviews). Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (200 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Zephyr - Test Management and Automation for Jira and Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.