Side-by-side comparison
Sync Jira work items (issues), fields, assets, teams, comments, attachments, and worklogs in real time across teams, vendors, and partners. Choose what syncs; keep sensitive data private. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 certified; EU, DE, and US data residency.
| Metric | Backbone Work Sync for Jira (Two Way Issue Sync) | Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.1 ★ | ★ 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 72 | ★ 442 |
| Active installs | 2,790+ | 15,226+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0.5/yr | ★ From $0/yr |
On the measured data here, Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) leads on more dimensions (3 vs 0). Pick Backbone Work Sync for Jira (Two Way Issue Sync) if one of the points where it leads is what you need.
Listed entry pricing: Backbone Work Sync for Jira (Two Way Issue Sync) at From $0.5/yr, Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) at From $0/yr. See the plans table for what each tier includes.
Built only from the Atlassian Marketplace listing data shown on this page. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparisons. Read the methodology
Read each app's audit: Backbone Work Sync for Jira (Two Way Issue Sync) audit • Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) audit
| Field | Backbone Work Sync for Jira (Two Way Issue Sync) | Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | |
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
| Pricing tiers |
|---|
| 6 tiers |
| — |
| Listed features | 3 | — |
|---|
No features listed.
No description available.
Neither Backbone Work Sync for Jira (Two Way Issue Sync) nor Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) lists a free plan. Backbone Work Sync for Jira (Two Way Issue Sync) lists no paid plan with a published price; Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) lists no paid plan with a published price. Prices are as listed on the Atlassian Marketplace; check what each tier includes in the Pricing section above.
Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 442 reviews) compared to Backbone Work Sync for Jira (Two Way Issue Sync) (4.1★ from 72 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly; Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) has more published reviews to read for user-reported install experience (442 vs 72).
AppRanks cannot say which fits a larger or smaller operation — there is no store-size measurement in the Atlassian Marketplace data. What it can show: Backbone Work Sync for Jira (Two Way Issue Sync) has 72 published reviews; Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) has 442 published reviews. Compare plan limits and pricing tiers against your own volume.
Migration support varies by app and category. Backbone Work Sync for Jira (Two Way Issue Sync) and Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Backbone Work Sync for Jira (Two Way Issue Sync)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.