Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Tempo creates embedded solutions that enable organizations, including some of the world’s most prestigious brands, to track, plan, manage and understand time, their most constrained resource.
| Enterprise Mail Handler for Jira Cloud (JEMHC) and DC | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
A feature rich Mail Handler deployed in US and EU regions for Cloud (JEMHC) and DataCenter (JEMH). Features include setting Jira issue fields via email, email only user support, editable outbound notification templates, test cases and auditing.
| Metric | Enterprise Mail Handler for Jira Cloud (JEMHC) and DC | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.6 ★ | 4.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | 90 | ★ 896 |
| Active installs | 1,696+ | 26,977+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ From $0.5/yr | From $1/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, Enterprise Mail Handler for Jira Cloud (JEMHC) and DC is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.6★ vs Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing differs significantly: Enterprise Mail Handler for Jira Cloud (JEMHC) and DC at From $0.5/yr vs Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking at From $1/yr (Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking is roughly 2.0x the entry-tier cost of Enterprise Mail Handler for Jira Cloud (JEMHC) and DC). The pricier tier typically signals deeper feature coverage or higher capacity ceilings; confirm the gap matches your actual feature requirements before treating cost as the deciding factor.
Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the larger user base (896 reviews vs 90), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Enterprise Mail Handler for Jira Cloud (JEMHC) and DC's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Enterprise Mail Handler for Jira Cloud (JEMHC) and DC; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking's 896-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Enterprise Mail Handler for Jira Cloud (JEMHC) and DC's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Enterprise Mail Handler for Jira Cloud (JEMHC) and DC audit • Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking audit
| Keyword | Enterprise Mail Handler for Jira Cloud (JEMHC) and DC | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| time | Not ranked | #7 |
Both Enterprise Mail Handler for Jira Cloud (JEMHC) and DC and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking offer paid plans only. Enterprise Mail Handler for Jira Cloud (JEMHC) and DC starts at From $0.5/yr; Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking starts at From $1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Enterprise Mail Handler for Jira Cloud (JEMHC) and DC has the higher average rating (4.6★ from 90 reviews) compared to Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking (4.1★ from 896 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Enterprise Mail Handler for Jira Cloud (JEMHC) and DC holds the higher average rating (4.6★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the deeper published review base (896 vs 90), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Enterprise Mail Handler for Jira Cloud (JEMHC) and DC typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (90 reviews). Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (896 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Enterprise Mail Handler for Jira Cloud (JEMHC) and DC and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Enterprise Mail Handler for Jira Cloud (JEMHC) and DC" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.