Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Synchronize issues and connect Jira instances across multiple teams and organizations, regardless of their version and hosting. Improve information flow efficiency, by automatically creating and updating issues, their statuses, and attributes.
| Issue Sync - Synchronization for Jira | Mria CRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Issue Sync - Synchronization for Jira | Mria CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 24 | ★ 25 |
| Active installs | 417+ | 338+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ From $0.132/yr | From $2/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, Mria CRM is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Issue Sync - Synchronization for Jira's 3.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing differs significantly: Issue Sync - Synchronization for Jira at From $0.132/yr vs Mria CRM at From $2/yr (Mria CRM is roughly 15.2x the entry-tier cost of Issue Sync - Synchronization for Jira). The pricier tier typically signals deeper feature coverage or higher capacity ceilings; confirm the gap matches your actual feature requirements before treating cost as the deciding factor.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Mria CRM; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Issue Sync - Synchronization for Jira's 24-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Mria CRM's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Issue Sync - Synchronization for Jira audit • Mria CRM audit
Both Issue Sync - Synchronization for Jira and Mria CRM offer paid plans only. Issue Sync - Synchronization for Jira starts at From $0.132/yr; Mria CRM starts at From $2/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Mria CRM has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 25 reviews) compared to Issue Sync - Synchronization for Jira (3.8★ from 24 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Mria CRM holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Mria CRM has the deeper published review base (25 vs 24), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Issue Sync - Synchronization for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (24 reviews). Mria CRM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (25 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Issue Sync - Synchronization for Jira and Mria CRM both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Issue Sync - Synchronization for Jira" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.