Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Custom fields that just work. Let teams capture structured data and surface key info at a glance in Jira and JSM. Faster decisions, fewer errors and work that keeps moving. Quick setup with zero maintenance.
| Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) | Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
All-in-one app for Jira workflow automation. Top-selling & top-rated. Easily configure Jira workflows with an unmatched collection of point-and-click post functions, conditions and validators, or do almost anything with simple yet powerful scripting.
| Metric | Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) | Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 534 | 27 |
| Active installs | 16,801+ | 1,120+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM edges out Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) at From $0/yr, Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) has the larger user base (534 reviews vs 27), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE)'s 534-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) audit • Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM audit
| Keyword | Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) | Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM |
|---|---|---|
| forms | Not ranked | #150 |
| form | Not ranked | #191 |
Both Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) and Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM offer paid plans only. Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) starts at From $0/yr; Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 27 reviews) compared to Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) (4.8★ from 534 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) has the deeper published review base (534 vs 27), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (534 reviews). Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (27 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) and Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.