Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
All-in-one app for Jira workflow automation. Top-selling & top-rated. Easily configure Jira workflows with an unmatched collection of point-and-click post functions, conditions and validators, or do almost anything with simple yet powerful scripting.
| Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) | Xray - Test Management for Jira | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
Complete your DevOps workflow with a Jira-native quality hub delivering visibility, traceability, and control across the SDLC, so teams can release the highest-quality software faster, with confidence.
| Metric | Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) | Xray - Test Management for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | 534 | ★ 552 |
| Active installs | 16,801+ | 25,413+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ From $0/yr | From $1/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Review velocity (30d) | — | 0 new |
Based on the data on this page, Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.8★ vs Xray - Test Management for Jira's 4.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) at From $0/yr, Xray - Test Management for Jira at From $1/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE); mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Xray - Test Management for Jira's 552-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE)'s broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) audit • Xray - Test Management for Jira audit
| Signal | Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) | Xray - Test Management for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.8 ★ (534) | 4.3 ★ (552) |
| Rating distribution | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— | 50% 467% 317% 217% 10% |
| Reviews · last 7 days | — | +0 |
| Reviews · last 30 days | — | +0 |
| Reviews · last 90 days | — | +0 |
No reviews yet.
Both Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) and Xray - Test Management for Jira offer paid plans only. Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) starts at From $0/yr; Xray - Test Management for Jira starts at From $1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 534 reviews) compared to Xray - Test Management for Jira (4.3★ from 552 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Xray - Test Management for Jira has the deeper published review base (552 vs 534), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (534 reviews). Xray - Test Management for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (552 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
I don't work much in Xray, but administering, configuring, installing, migrating it... The support is always excellent.
We've been using Xray for many years with the DC app. We recently migrated to the cloud and during that process we had a number of challenges surface. We received excellent support from the team, in the months leading up to the migration and during the migration weekend, where we did face an issue. Their professional a
Xray is really an important part of our quality assurance efforts. We have quite a lot of automated processes running through it, and find ourselves continuing to build more around this great tool. The support team has also been great to work with in the rare case we have needed assistance.
We have been using Xray for a long time now, and it helps us greatly in keeping our product quality assurance efficient and clean. Thank you very much for this great product. Recently I had contact with the support team and would like to mention how friendly and professional they are—no bots, no AI, no first responders
I really prefer ZEphyr over Xray, still the Ai features are good. Still my team spends a lot of time in Zephyr/Xray and JIRA. Not sure how this can be avoided.
Migration support varies by app and category. Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) and Xray - Test Management for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.