Jira Misc Custom Fields (JMCF) vs Sync - Entra ID (Azure AD) & Okta User Attributes for Jira

Sync - Entra ID (Azure AD) & Okta User Attributes for Jira edges out Jira Misc Custom Fields (JMCF) on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing entry tiers: Jira Misc Custom Fields (JMCF) at From $0/yr, Sync - Entra ID (Azure AD) & Okta User Attributes for Jira at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Sync - Entra ID (Azure AD) & Okta User Attributes for Jira; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Jira Misc Custom Fields (JMCF)'s 92-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Sync - Entra ID (Azure AD) & Okta User Attributes for Jira's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Read each app's audit: Jira Misc Custom Fields (JMCF) audit • Sync - Entra ID (Azure AD) & Okta User Attributes for Jira audit

• Browse the atlassian compare hub
• Browse all atlassian apps
• Compare metrics glossary