QMetry - Test Management for Jira (QTM4J) vs Approval Path for Jira

Based on the data on this page, Approval Path for Jira is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace merchants — 5.0★ vs QMetry - Test Management for Jira (QTM4J)'s 4.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: QMetry - Test Management for Jira (QTM4J) at From $0/yr, Approval Path for Jira at From $1/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. QMetry - Test Management for Jira (QTM4J) has the larger user base (200 reviews vs 25), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Approval Path for Jira's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Approval Path for Jira; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — QMetry - Test Management for Jira (QTM4J)'s 200-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Approval Path for Jira's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Read each app's audit: QMetry - Test Management for Jira (QTM4J) audit • Approval Path for Jira audit

• Browse the atlassian compare hub
• Browse all atlassian apps
• Compare metrics glossary