Side-by-side comparison
Financial PPM for Jira. Budget and track projects, and portfolios with EVM or traditional techniques. Forecast costs, revenues, and profitability in real-time for any project, agile or traditional. Manage staff and resource allocation.
Gain deeper visibility into your teams’ tracked time efforts via a comprehensive financial overview, organized by individuals, teams and projects.
| Metric | Budgets - Jira Project Budget Management | Tempo | Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.7 ★ | 3.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 55 | 46 |
| Active installs | 708+ | 3,166+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | — | From $1/yr |
| Pricing tiers | — |
Budgets and Financial Manager each lead on different measured dimensions — pick by the one that matters most to you.
Built only from the Atlassian Marketplace listing data shown on this page. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparisons. Read the methodology
Read each app's audit: Budgets - Jira Project Budget Management | Tempo audit • Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo audit
| Field | Budgets - Jira Project Budget Management | Tempo | Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
| 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
|---|
| Keyword | Budgets - Jira Project Budget Management | Tempo | Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo |
|---|---|---|
| time | Not ranked | #500 |
No tracked changes.
Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo doesn't list a free plan; the Atlassian Marketplace publishes no pricing for Budgets - Jira Project Budget Management | Tempo. Prices are as listed on the Atlassian Marketplace; check what each tier includes in the Pricing section above.
Budgets - Jira Project Budget Management | Tempo has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 55 reviews) compared to Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo (3.8★ from 46 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Budgets - Jira Project Budget Management | Tempo holds the higher average rating (4.7★ vs 3.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly; Budgets - Jira Project Budget Management | Tempo has more published reviews to read for user-reported install experience (55 vs 46).
AppRanks cannot say which fits a larger or smaller operation — there is no store-size measurement in the Atlassian Marketplace data. What it can show: Budgets - Jira Project Budget Management | Tempo has 55 published reviews; Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo has 46 published reviews. Compare plan limits and pricing tiers against your own volume.
Migration support varies by app and category. Budgets - Jira Project Budget Management | Tempo and Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.