Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Financial PPM for Jira. Budget and track projects, and portfolios with EVM or traditional techniques. Forecast costs, revenues, and profitability in real-time for any project, agile or traditional. Manage staff and resource allocation.
| Budgets - Jira Project Budget Management | Tempo | Mria CRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Budgets - Jira Project Budget Management | Tempo | Mria CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 55 | 25 |
| Active installs | 697+ | 338+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | — | From $2/yr |
| Pricing tiers | — | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Mria CRM edges out Budgets - Jira Project Budget Management | Tempo on rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Mria CRM; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Budgets - Jira Project Budget Management | Tempo's 55-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Mria CRM's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Budgets - Jira Project Budget Management | Tempo audit • Mria CRM audit
Mria CRM has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 25 reviews) compared to Budgets - Jira Project Budget Management | Tempo (4.7★ from 55 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Mria CRM holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Budgets - Jira Project Budget Management | Tempo has the deeper published review base (55 vs 25), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Budgets - Jira Project Budget Management | Tempo typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (55 reviews). Mria CRM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (25 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Budgets - Jira Project Budget Management | Tempo and Mria CRM both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Mria CRM" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.