Side-by-side comparison
Sync Jira work items (issues), fields, assets, teams, comments, attachments, and worklogs in real time across teams, vendors, and partners. Choose what syncs; keep sensitive data private. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 certified; EU, DE, and US data residency.
| Metric | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking | Backbone Work Sync for Jira (Two Way Issue Sync) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.6 ★ | 4.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 298 | 72 |
| Active installs | 12,302+ | 2,790+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ From $0/yr | From $0.5/yr |
| Pricing tiers | — |
On the measured data here, Timesheets by Tempo leads on more dimensions (3 vs 0). Pick Backbone Work Sync for Jira (Two Way Issue Sync) if one of the points where it leads is what you need.
Listed entry pricing: Timesheets by Tempo at From $0/yr, Backbone Work Sync for Jira (Two Way Issue Sync) at From $0.5/yr. See the plans table for what each tier includes.
Built only from the Atlassian Marketplace listing data shown on this page. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparisons. Read the methodology
Read each app's audit: Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking audit • Backbone Work Sync for Jira (Two Way Issue Sync) audit
| Field | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking | Backbone Work Sync for Jira (Two Way Issue Sync) |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | |
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
| 6 tiers |
| Listed features | — | 3 |
|---|
No features listed.
No description available.
Neither Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking nor Backbone Work Sync for Jira (Two Way Issue Sync) lists a free plan. Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking lists no paid plan with a published price; Backbone Work Sync for Jira (Two Way Issue Sync) lists no paid plan with a published price. Prices are as listed on the Atlassian Marketplace; check what each tier includes in the Pricing section above.
Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the higher average rating (4.6★ from 298 reviews) compared to Backbone Work Sync for Jira (Two Way Issue Sync) (4.1★ from 72 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking holds the higher average rating (4.6★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly; Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has more published reviews to read for user-reported install experience (298 vs 72).
AppRanks cannot say which fits a larger or smaller operation — there is no store-size measurement in the Atlassian Marketplace data. What it can show: Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has 298 published reviews; Backbone Work Sync for Jira (Two Way Issue Sync) has 72 published reviews. Compare plan limits and pricing tiers against your own volume.
Migration support varies by app and category. Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking and Backbone Work Sync for Jira (Two Way Issue Sync) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Backbone Work Sync for Jira (Two Way Issue Sync)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.