Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Looking for the best way to announce or share your news to your Confluence users? The News Teaser add-on for Confluence provides multiple macros to easily display news from blogposts and pages in a beautiful way.
| Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence | News Teaser for Confluence | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Communicate Complexity Clearly with Secure, AI-Driven Diagramming — Built for Teams in Confluence. UML, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts
| Metric | Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence | News Teaser for Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.6 ★ | ★ 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 797 | 12 |
| Active installs | 17,886+ | 398+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, News Teaser for Confluence is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace merchants — 4.0★ vs Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence's 3.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence has the larger user base (797 reviews vs 12), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. News Teaser for Confluence's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to News Teaser for Confluence; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence's 797-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than News Teaser for Confluence's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence audit • News Teaser for Confluence audit
News Teaser for Confluence has the higher average rating (4.0★ from 12 reviews) compared to Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence (3.6★ from 797 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; News Teaser for Confluence is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace marketplace. Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence has more onboarding documentation maturity (797 reviews vs 12), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (797 reviews). News Teaser for Confluence aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (12 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence and News Teaser for Confluence both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from News Teaser for Confluence" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.