Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Streamline development workflows across GitHub, Jira, and your Atlassian apps having unified data with one, Atlassian-powered app
| GitHub for Atlassian | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Tempo creates embedded solutions that enable organizations, including some of the world’s most prestigious brands, to track, plan, manage and understand time, their most constrained resource.
| Metric | GitHub for Atlassian | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.3 ★ | ★ 4.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | 508 | ★ 896 |
| Active installs | 136,672+ | 27,077+ |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | ★ Free | From $1/yr |
| Pricing tiers | — | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.1★ vs GitHub for Atlassian's 3.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, GitHub for Atlassian offers a free tier (Free) while Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking starts at From $1/yr. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the larger user base (896 reviews vs 508), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. GitHub for Atlassian's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — GitHub for Atlassian's 508-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: GitHub for Atlassian audit • Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking audit
| Keyword | GitHub for Atlassian | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| time | Not ranked | #7 |
GitHub for Atlassian is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking starts at From $1/yr. Both publish their pricing on the Atlassian Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the higher average rating (4.1★ from 896 reviews) compared to GitHub for Atlassian (3.3★ from 508 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking holds the higher average rating (4.1★ vs 3.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the deeper published review base (896 vs 508), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
GitHub for Atlassian typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (508 reviews). Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (896 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. GitHub for Atlassian and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from GitHub for Atlassian" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.