Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Streamline development workflows across GitHub, Jira, and your Atlassian apps having unified data with one, Atlassian-powered app
| GitHub for Atlassian | Aha! Roadmaps for Jira | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Aha! is the world's #1 product roadmap software. Do your product planning in Aha! and push features to Jira. Get updates in real-time. Integrate for free to get your product mojo back (works with On-demand and On-prem). You need a paid Aha! account.
| Metric | GitHub for Atlassian | Aha! Roadmaps for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.3 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 508 | 357 |
| Active installs | 136,672+ | 1,659+ |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free | — |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, Aha! Roadmaps for Jira is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.9★ vs GitHub for Atlassian's 3.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
GitHub for Atlassian has the larger user base (508 reviews vs 357), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Aha! Roadmaps for Jira's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Aha! Roadmaps for Jira; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — GitHub for Atlassian's 508-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Aha! Roadmaps for Jira's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: GitHub for Atlassian audit • Aha! Roadmaps for Jira audit
Aha! Roadmaps for Jira has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 357 reviews) compared to GitHub for Atlassian (3.3★ from 508 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Aha! Roadmaps for Jira holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 3.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. GitHub for Atlassian has the deeper published review base (508 vs 357), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
GitHub for Atlassian typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (508 reviews). Aha! Roadmaps for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (357 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. GitHub for Atlassian and Aha! Roadmaps for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Aha! Roadmaps for Jira" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.