GitHub for Atlassian vs ScriptRunner for Jira

Based on the data on this page, ScriptRunner for Jira is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.6★ vs GitHub for Atlassian's 3.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

On pricing, GitHub for Atlassian offers a free tier (Free) while ScriptRunner for Jira starts at From $0/yr. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.

ScriptRunner for Jira has the larger user base (822 reviews vs 508), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. GitHub for Atlassian's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to ScriptRunner for Jira; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — GitHub for Atlassian's 508-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than ScriptRunner for Jira's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is GitHub for Atlassian or ScriptRunner for Jira cheaper?

GitHub for Atlassian is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). ScriptRunner for Jira starts at From $0/yr. Both publish their pricing on the Atlassian Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, GitHub for Atlassian or ScriptRunner for Jira?

ScriptRunner for Jira has the higher average rating (4.6★ from 822 reviews) compared to GitHub for Atlassian (3.3★ from 508 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose GitHub for Atlassian or ScriptRunner for Jira?

ScriptRunner for Jira holds the higher average rating (4.6★ vs 3.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, GitHub for Atlassian or ScriptRunner for Jira?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. ScriptRunner for Jira has the deeper published review base (822 vs 508), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

GitHub for Atlassian typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (508 reviews). ScriptRunner for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (822 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between GitHub for Atlassian and ScriptRunner for Jira?

Migration support varies by app and category. GitHub for Atlassian and ScriptRunner for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from GitHub for Atlassian" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.