Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Automate the entire content lifecycle—from quality checks and multi-step approvals to audits and regulatory workflows. Publish content, add labels, send emails, and more using built-in automations.
| AURA Workflow & Approval for Confluence (Page Publishing) | Default Values for 'Create Issue' screen - Issue Templates | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
Create issues faster and improve their quality with default values for fields on "Create Issue" screen.
| Metric | AURA Workflow & Approval for Confluence (Page Publishing) | Default Values for 'Create Issue' screen - Issue Templates |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 31 | 26 |
| Active installs | 262+ | 2,499+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, AURA Workflow & Approval for Confluence (Page Publishing) is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Default Values for 'Create Issue' screen - Issue Templates's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: AURA Workflow & Approval for Confluence (Page Publishing) at From $0/yr, Default Values for 'Create Issue' screen - Issue Templates at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to AURA Workflow & Approval for Confluence (Page Publishing); mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Default Values for 'Create Issue' screen - Issue Templates's 26-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than AURA Workflow & Approval for Confluence (Page Publishing)'s broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: AURA Workflow & Approval for Confluence (Page Publishing) audit • Default Values for 'Create Issue' screen - Issue Templates audit
Both AURA Workflow & Approval for Confluence (Page Publishing) and Default Values for 'Create Issue' screen - Issue Templates offer paid plans only. AURA Workflow & Approval for Confluence (Page Publishing) starts at From $0/yr; Default Values for 'Create Issue' screen - Issue Templates starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
AURA Workflow & Approval for Confluence (Page Publishing) has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 31 reviews) compared to Default Values for 'Create Issue' screen - Issue Templates (4.1★ from 26 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
AURA Workflow & Approval for Confluence (Page Publishing) holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. AURA Workflow & Approval for Confluence (Page Publishing) has the deeper published review base (31 vs 26), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
AURA Workflow & Approval for Confluence (Page Publishing) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (31 reviews). Default Values for 'Create Issue' screen - Issue Templates typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (26 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. AURA Workflow & Approval for Confluence (Page Publishing) and Default Values for 'Create Issue' screen - Issue Templates both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Default Values for 'Create Issue' screen - Issue Templates" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.