Jira Workflow Toolbox vs HTML Macro for Confluence

Jira Workflow Toolbox and HTML Macro for Confluence are evenly matched on rating (4.9★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.

Pricing entry tiers: Jira Workflow Toolbox at From $0/yr, HTML Macro for Confluence at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Jira Workflow Toolbox has the larger user base (539 reviews vs 31), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. HTML Macro for Confluence's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most teams the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Jira Workflow Toolbox or HTML Macro for Confluence cheaper?

Both Jira Workflow Toolbox and HTML Macro for Confluence offer paid plans only. Jira Workflow Toolbox starts at From $0/yr; HTML Macro for Confluence starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Jira Workflow Toolbox or HTML Macro for Confluence?

Jira Workflow Toolbox (4.9★, 539 reviews) and HTML Macro for Confluence (5.0★, 31 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.

Should I choose Jira Workflow Toolbox or HTML Macro for Confluence?

HTML Macro for Confluence holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Jira Workflow Toolbox or HTML Macro for Confluence?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Jira Workflow Toolbox has the deeper published review base (539 vs 31), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

Jira Workflow Toolbox typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (539 reviews). HTML Macro for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (31 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.