Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Portfolio & project management solution to view your work across any Jira projects and teams, all in one place.
| Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | Exalate | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | Exalate |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 ★ | 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 408 | 218 |
| Active installs | 12,974+ | 3,903+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $1/yr | ★ From $0.6/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM edges out Exalate on rating (4.5★ vs 4.3★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing is noticeably different: Exalate at From $0.6/yr vs Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM at From $1/yr (~67% premium on the entry tier). For early-stage teams the cheaper tier is the lower-risk starting point; mid-market teams should compare the specific capacity gates the higher tier unlocks before treating the premium as justified.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the larger user base (408 reviews vs 218), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Exalate's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Exalate's 218-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM audit • Exalate audit
Both Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and Exalate offer paid plans only. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM starts at From $1/yr; Exalate starts at From $0.6/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 408 reviews) compared to Exalate (4.3★ from 218 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the deeper published review base (408 vs 218), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (408 reviews). Exalate typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (218 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and Exalate both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Exalate" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.