Links Hierarchy vs draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts

Based on the data on this page, draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.8★ vs Links Hierarchy: Track Work item Dependency and Progress's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: Links Hierarchy: Track Work item Dependency and Progress at From $0/yr, draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the larger user base (1,204 reviews vs 28), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Links Hierarchy: Track Work item Dependency and Progress's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Links Hierarchy: Track Work item Dependency and Progress's 28-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Links Hierarchy: Track Work item Dependency and Progress or draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts cheaper?

Both Links Hierarchy: Track Work item Dependency and Progress and draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts offer paid plans only. Links Hierarchy: Track Work item Dependency and Progress starts at From $0/yr; draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Links Hierarchy: Track Work item Dependency and Progress or draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts?

draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 1,204 reviews) compared to Links Hierarchy: Track Work item Dependency and Progress (4.1★ from 28 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Links Hierarchy: Track Work item Dependency and Progress or draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts?

draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Links Hierarchy: Track Work item Dependency and Progress or draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the deeper published review base (1,204 vs 28), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.