Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
TeamBoard ProScheduler is where you can plan projects, manage your team's capacity and monitor overtime. Your team’s workload is visualized on the board. You can track project resources easily.
| Project Management, Resource Planning & Gantt Chart for Jira | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Tempo creates embedded solutions that enable organizations, including some of the world’s most prestigious brands, to track, plan, manage and understand time, their most constrained resource.
| Metric | Project Management, Resource Planning & Gantt Chart for Jira | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.3 ★ | 4.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | 175 | ★ 896 |
| Active installs | 3,151+ | 26,977+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ From $0/yr | From $1/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Project Management, Resource Planning & Gantt Chart for Jira edges out Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking on rating (4.3★ vs 4.1★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Project Management, Resource Planning & Gantt Chart for Jira at From $0/yr, Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking at From $1/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the larger user base (896 reviews vs 175), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Project Management, Resource Planning & Gantt Chart for Jira's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Project Management, Resource Planning & Gantt Chart for Jira; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking's 896-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Project Management, Resource Planning & Gantt Chart for Jira's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Project Management, Resource Planning & Gantt Chart for Jira audit • Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking audit
| Keyword | Project Management, Resource Planning & Gantt Chart for Jira | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| time | #494 | #7 |
Both Project Management, Resource Planning & Gantt Chart for Jira and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking offer paid plans only. Project Management, Resource Planning & Gantt Chart for Jira starts at From $0/yr; Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking starts at From $1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Project Management, Resource Planning & Gantt Chart for Jira has the higher average rating (4.3★ from 175 reviews) compared to Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking (4.1★ from 896 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Project Management, Resource Planning & Gantt Chart for Jira holds the higher average rating (4.3★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the deeper published review base (896 vs 175), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Project Management, Resource Planning & Gantt Chart for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (175 reviews). Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (896 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Project Management, Resource Planning & Gantt Chart for Jira and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Project Management, Resource Planning & Gantt Chart for Jira" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.