HTML Macro for Confluence vs Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning

HTML Macro for Confluence edges out Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

Pricing entry tiers: Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning at From $0/yr, HTML Macro for Confluence at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning has the larger user base (116 reviews vs 31), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. HTML Macro for Confluence's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to HTML Macro for Confluence; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning's 116-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than HTML Macro for Confluence's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning or HTML Macro for Confluence cheaper?

Both Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning and HTML Macro for Confluence offer paid plans only. Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning starts at From $0/yr; HTML Macro for Confluence starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning or HTML Macro for Confluence?

HTML Macro for Confluence has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 31 reviews) compared to Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning (4.8★ from 116 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning or HTML Macro for Confluence?

HTML Macro for Confluence holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning or HTML Macro for Confluence?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning has the deeper published review base (116 vs 31), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?