Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
TeamBoard TimePlanner gives full control over resource management in Jira. Track time accurately with simple timesheets, plan team capacity smartly, manage leave approvals smoothly, and monitor costs – no more guesswork, burnout, or budget surprises.
| Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning | BPMN Modeler Enterprise | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated |
Core processes are the backbone of every organization. The Enterprise Version of the BPMN Modeler for Confluence lets you bind your processes together, build process nets and combine process information with other relevant organizational aspects.
| Metric | Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning | BPMN Modeler Enterprise |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 116 | 24 |
| Active installs | 1,311+ | 1,140+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ From $0/yr | From $1.1/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
BPMN Modeler Enterprise edges out Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning at From $0/yr, BPMN Modeler Enterprise at From $1.1/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning has the larger user base (116 reviews vs 24), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. BPMN Modeler Enterprise's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to BPMN Modeler Enterprise; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning's 116-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than BPMN Modeler Enterprise's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning audit • BPMN Modeler Enterprise audit
| — |
| Keyword | Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning | BPMN Modeler Enterprise |
|---|---|---|
| time | #23 | Not ranked |
Both Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning and BPMN Modeler Enterprise offer paid plans only. Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning starts at From $0/yr; BPMN Modeler Enterprise starts at From $1.1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
BPMN Modeler Enterprise has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 24 reviews) compared to Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning (4.8★ from 116 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
BPMN Modeler Enterprise holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning has the deeper published review base (116 vs 24), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (116 reviews). BPMN Modeler Enterprise typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (24 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Timesheets, Time Tracking & Capacity Resource Planning and BPMN Modeler Enterprise both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from BPMN Modeler Enterprise" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.