Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence vs Description History Tab for Jira

Based on the data on this page, Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Description History Tab for Jira's 3.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

On pricing, Description History Tab for Jira offers a free tier (Free) while Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence starts at From $1/yr. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Description History Tab for Jira's 21-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Description History Tab for Jira or Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence cheaper?

Description History Tab for Jira is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence starts at From $1/yr. Both publish their pricing on the Atlassian Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, Description History Tab for Jira or Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence?

Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 53 reviews) compared to Description History Tab for Jira (3.8★ from 21 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Description History Tab for Jira or Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence?

Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Description History Tab for Jira or Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence has the deeper published review base (53 vs 21), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.