Side-by-side comparison
Transform Confluence into a comprehensive document management solution. Comala Document Management lets you personalize and automate workflows to manage Confluence content throughout its lifecycle.
- Add custom HTML to Confluence pages - Use CSS and Javascript to enhance looks and functionality - Run code snippets - Embed external contents and web pages as Iframe
| Metric | Comala Document Management | HTML Macro for Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 175 | 31 |
| Active installs | 6,124+ | 2,327+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Comala Document Management and HTML Macro for Confluence each lead on different measured dimensions — pick by the one that matters most to you.
Listed entry pricing: Comala Document Management at From $0/yr, HTML Macro for Confluence at From $0/yr. See the plans table for what each tier includes.
Built only from the Atlassian Marketplace listing data shown on this page. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparisons. Read the methodology
Read each app's audit: Comala Document Management audit • HTML Macro for Confluence audit
| Field | Comala Document Management | HTML Macro for Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
| Keyword | Comala Document Management | HTML Macro for Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| forms | Not ranked | #54 |
| form | Not ranked | #98 |
Both Comala Document Management and HTML Macro for Confluence offer a free plan. Comala Document Management lists no paid plan with a published price; HTML Macro for Confluence lists no paid plan with a published price. Prices are as listed on the Atlassian Marketplace; check what each tier includes in the Pricing section above.
HTML Macro for Confluence has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 31 reviews) compared to Comala Document Management (4.7★ from 175 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
HTML Macro for Confluence holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly; Comala Document Management has more published reviews to read for user-reported install experience (175 vs 31).
AppRanks cannot say which fits a larger or smaller operation — there is no store-size measurement in the Atlassian Marketplace data. What it can show: Comala Document Management has 175 published reviews; HTML Macro for Confluence has 31 published reviews. Compare plan limits and pricing tiers against your own volume.
Migration support varies by app and category. Comala Document Management and HTML Macro for Confluence both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from HTML Macro for Confluence" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.