Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Collaborate on draft pages and then publish them to a designated location, allowing you to maintain Confluence spaces or collections (DC only) for your public and work-in-progress content.
| Comala Publishing | Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
#1 Marketplace app for data management and reporting. Transform static Confluence pages into always-on interactive reports with advanced table filters, pivot calculations, Excel-like spreadsheets, custom charts, and more
| Metric | Comala Publishing | Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 40 | ★ 442 |
| Active installs | 1,357+ | 15,155+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Comala Publishing and Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence are evenly matched on rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: Comala Publishing at From $0/yr, Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence has the larger user base (442 reviews vs 40), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Comala Publishing's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most teams the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Comala Publishing audit • Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence audit
Both Comala Publishing and Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence offer paid plans only. Comala Publishing starts at From $0/yr; Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Comala Publishing (4.9★, 40 reviews) and Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence (4.8★, 442 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
Comala Publishing holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence has the deeper published review base (442 vs 40), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Comala Publishing typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (40 reviews). Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (442 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Comala Publishing and Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Comala Publishing" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.