HTML Macro for Confluence vs Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics)

Based on the data on this page, HTML Macro for Confluence is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics)'s 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) at From $0/yr, HTML Macro for Confluence at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) has the larger user base (134 reviews vs 31), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. HTML Macro for Confluence's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to HTML Macro for Confluence; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics)'s 134-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than HTML Macro for Confluence's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) or HTML Macro for Confluence cheaper?

Both Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) and HTML Macro for Confluence offer paid plans only. Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) starts at From $0/yr; HTML Macro for Confluence starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) or HTML Macro for Confluence?

HTML Macro for Confluence has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 31 reviews) compared to Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) (4.5★ from 134 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) or HTML Macro for Confluence?

HTML Macro for Confluence holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) or HTML Macro for Confluence?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) has the deeper published review base (134 vs 31), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.