Sprint Reviewer Pro vs Awesome Graphs for Bitbucket

Which has better reviews, Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira or Awesome Graphs for Bitbucket?

Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 27 reviews) compared to Awesome Graphs for Bitbucket (4.4★ from 85 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira or Awesome Graphs for Bitbucket?

It depends on what you're optimizing for. Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Awesome Graphs for Bitbucket is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira or Awesome Graphs for Bitbucket?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace marketplace. Awesome Graphs for Bitbucket has more onboarding documentation maturity (85 reviews vs 27), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace stores?

Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (27 reviews). Awesome Graphs for Bitbucket aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (85 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira and Awesome Graphs for Bitbucket?