Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Integrity Check detects and prevents corrupted configuration from being deployed on a production instance while giving you the ability to perform a series of quick actions.
| Integrity Check for Jira | Approval Path for Jira | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Jira and Jira Service Management approval management that lets teams design multi-step, multi-level approval processes with custom rules and conditions. Route by manager, role, group, or work field, and run steps in sequence or in parallel.
| Metric | Integrity Check for Jira | Approval Path for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.4 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 9 | ★ 26 |
| Active installs | 2,849+ | 260+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | — | From $1/yr |
| Pricing tiers | — | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, Approval Path for Jira is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Integrity Check for Jira's 4.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Approval Path for Jira; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Integrity Check for Jira's 9-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Approval Path for Jira's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Integrity Check for Jira audit • Approval Path for Jira audit
| Keyword | Integrity Check for Jira | Approval Path for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| time | Not ranked | #341 |
Approval Path for Jira has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 26 reviews) compared to Integrity Check for Jira (4.4★ from 9 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Approval Path for Jira holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.4★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Approval Path for Jira has the deeper published review base (26 vs 9), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Integrity Check for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (9 reviews). Approval Path for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (26 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Integrity Check for Jira and Approval Path for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Integrity Check for Jira" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.