Balsamiq for Confluence Cloud | Wireframes & prototypes vs Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE)

Based on the data on this page, Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.8★ vs Balsamiq for Confluence Cloud | Wireframes & prototypes's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: Balsamiq for Confluence Cloud | Wireframes & prototypes at From $0.8/yr, Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) has the larger user base (534 reviews vs 23), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Balsamiq for Confluence Cloud | Wireframes & prototypes's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE); mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Balsamiq for Confluence Cloud | Wireframes & prototypes's 23-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE)'s broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Balsamiq for Confluence Cloud | Wireframes & prototypes or Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) cheaper?

Both Balsamiq for Confluence Cloud | Wireframes & prototypes and Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) offer paid plans only. Balsamiq for Confluence Cloud | Wireframes & prototypes starts at From $0.8/yr; Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Balsamiq for Confluence Cloud | Wireframes & prototypes or Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE)?

Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 534 reviews) compared to Balsamiq for Confluence Cloud | Wireframes & prototypes (4.1★ from 23 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Balsamiq for Confluence Cloud | Wireframes & prototypes or Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE)?

Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Balsamiq for Confluence Cloud | Wireframes & prototypes or Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE)?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) has the deeper published review base (534 vs 23), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.