Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Project Configurator helps with handling changes in Jira. Use it to test configuration and data changes on staging servers before they go live or to split/duplicate Jira projects and configurations.
| Project Configurator for Jira | Aha! Roadmaps for Jira | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Aha! is the world's #1 product roadmap software. Do your product planning in Aha! and push features to Jira. Get updates in real-time. Integrate for free to get your product mojo back (works with On-demand and On-prem). You need a paid Aha! account.
| Metric | Project Configurator for Jira | Aha! Roadmaps for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 115 | ★ 357 |
| Active installs | 1,803+ | 1,689+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Aha! Roadmaps for Jira edges out Project Configurator for Jira on rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Aha! Roadmaps for Jira has the larger user base (357 reviews vs 115), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Project Configurator for Jira's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Aha! Roadmaps for Jira; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Project Configurator for Jira's 115-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Aha! Roadmaps for Jira's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Project Configurator for Jira audit • Aha! Roadmaps for Jira audit
Aha! Roadmaps for Jira has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 357 reviews) compared to Project Configurator for Jira (4.8★ from 115 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Project Configurator for Jira fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Aha! Roadmaps for Jira is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace marketplace. Aha! Roadmaps for Jira has more onboarding documentation maturity (357 reviews vs 115), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Project Configurator for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (115 reviews). Aha! Roadmaps for Jira aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (357 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Project Configurator for Jira and Aha! Roadmaps for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Project Configurator for Jira" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.