Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Project Configurator helps with handling changes in Jira. Use it to test configuration and data changes on staging servers before they go live or to split/duplicate Jira projects and configurations.
| Project Configurator for Jira | Single Sign On SAML SSO for Jira (SSO SAML) + User Sync/SCIM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
SAML Single Sign On/SSO into JIRA & Customer Portal (ServiceDesk) using ADFS, Azure AD, Okta, Google Apps/GSuite, OneLogin, Shibboleth, Centrify, Keycloak, Ping, OpenAM,Bitium,RSA & more. Fully supported, most affordable with a range of SSO features.
| Metric | Project Configurator for Jira | Single Sign On SAML SSO for Jira (SSO SAML) + User Sync/SCIM |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 115 | 82 |
| Active installs | 1,824+ | 432+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | — | From $1.2/yr |
| Pricing tiers | — | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Single Sign On SAML SSO for Jira (SSO SAML) + User Sync/SCIM edges out Project Configurator for Jira on rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Single Sign On SAML SSO for Jira (SSO SAML) + User Sync/SCIM; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Project Configurator for Jira's 115-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Single Sign On SAML SSO for Jira (SSO SAML) + User Sync/SCIM's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Project Configurator for Jira audit • Single Sign On SAML SSO for Jira (SSO SAML) + User Sync/SCIM audit
Single Sign On SAML SSO for Jira (SSO SAML) + User Sync/SCIM has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 82 reviews) compared to Project Configurator for Jira (4.8★ from 115 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Single Sign On SAML SSO for Jira (SSO SAML) + User Sync/SCIM holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Project Configurator for Jira has the deeper published review base (115 vs 82), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Project Configurator for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (115 reviews). Single Sign On SAML SSO for Jira (SSO SAML) + User Sync/SCIM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (82 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Project Configurator for Jira and Single Sign On SAML SSO for Jira (SSO SAML) + User Sync/SCIM both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Single Sign On SAML SSO for Jira (SSO SAML) + User Sync/SCIM" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.