Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Number your headings automatically, so you can focus on your work. Choose between several formatting options or make your own.
| Just Add+ Embed Markdown, Diagrams, & Code in Confluence Git | Numbered Headings | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Render Markdown to HTML in Confluence. Insert inline markdown text or a URL in the macro to display the content on your page.
| Metric | Just Add+ Embed Markdown, Diagrams, & Code in Confluence Git | Numbered Headings |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2 ★ | ★ 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | 50 | ★ 114 |
| Active installs | 8,336+ | 5,298+ |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Numbered Headings edges out Just Add+ Embed Markdown, Diagrams, & Code in Confluence Git on rating (4.5★ vs 4.2★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, Just Add+ Embed Markdown, Diagrams, & Code in Confluence Git offers a free tier (Free) while Numbered Headings starts at From $0/yr. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Numbered Headings has the larger user base (114 reviews vs 50), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Just Add+ Embed Markdown, Diagrams, & Code in Confluence Git's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Numbered Headings; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Just Add+ Embed Markdown, Diagrams, & Code in Confluence Git's 50-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Numbered Headings's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Just Add+ Embed Markdown, Diagrams, & Code in Confluence Git audit • Numbered Headings audit
| Keyword | Just Add+ Embed Markdown, Diagrams, & Code in Confluence Git | Numbered Headings |
|---|---|---|
| forms | #254 | Not ranked |
| time | Not ranked | #277 |
| form | #365 | Not ranked |
Just Add+ Embed Markdown, Diagrams, & Code in Confluence Git is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). Numbered Headings starts at From $0/yr. Both publish their pricing on the Atlassian Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Numbered Headings has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 114 reviews) compared to Just Add+ Embed Markdown, Diagrams, & Code in Confluence Git (4.2★ from 50 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Numbered Headings holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 4.2★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Numbered Headings has the deeper published review base (114 vs 50), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Just Add+ Embed Markdown, Diagrams, & Code in Confluence Git typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (50 reviews). Numbered Headings typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (114 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Just Add+ Embed Markdown, Diagrams, & Code in Confluence Git and Numbered Headings both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Just Add+ Embed Markdown, Diagrams, & Code in Confluence Git" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.