Multi Level & Tree Fields vs Storage Format Source Editor for Confluence

Based on the data on this page, Multi Level & Tree Fields is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Storage Format Source Editor for Confluence's 4.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

On pricing, Storage Format Source Editor for Confluence offers a free tier (Free) while Multi Level & Tree Fields starts at From $0/yr. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Multi Level & Tree Fields; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Storage Format Source Editor for Confluence's 94-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Multi Level & Tree Fields's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Multi Level & Tree Fields or Storage Format Source Editor for Confluence cheaper?

Storage Format Source Editor for Confluence is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). Multi Level & Tree Fields starts at From $0/yr. Both publish their pricing on the Atlassian Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, Multi Level & Tree Fields or Storage Format Source Editor for Confluence?

Multi Level & Tree Fields has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 25 reviews) compared to Storage Format Source Editor for Confluence (4.2★ from 94 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Multi Level & Tree Fields or Storage Format Source Editor for Confluence?

Multi Level & Tree Fields holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.2★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Multi Level & Tree Fields or Storage Format Source Editor for Confluence?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Storage Format Source Editor for Confluence has the deeper published review base (94 vs 25), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

Multi Level & Tree Fields typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (25 reviews). Storage Format Source Editor for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (94 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.