File Field | Attachment Custom Fields for Jira vs Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence

Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence edges out File Field | Attachment Custom Fields for Jira on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

Pricing entry tiers: File Field | Attachment Custom Fields for Jira at From $0/yr, Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence at From $1/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — File Field | Attachment Custom Fields for Jira's 35-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is File Field | Attachment Custom Fields for Jira or Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence cheaper?

Both File Field | Attachment Custom Fields for Jira and Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence offer paid plans only. File Field | Attachment Custom Fields for Jira starts at From $0/yr; Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence starts at From $1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, File Field | Attachment Custom Fields for Jira or Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence?

Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 53 reviews) compared to File Field | Attachment Custom Fields for Jira (4.9★ from 35 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose File Field | Attachment Custom Fields for Jira or Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence?

Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, File Field | Attachment Custom Fields for Jira or Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence has the deeper published review base (53 vs 35), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.