Loading content…
Side-by-side comparison
Remove estimations meetings and follow a less is more approach: estimations happen inside the issue view. More consensus, no configuration needed.
| Metric | Shared Estimations (formerly Open Poker) | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.7 ★ | 4.6 ★ |
| Total reviews | 9 | ★ 298 |
| Active installs | 164+ | 12,302+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
Shared Estimations (formerly Open Poker) and Timesheets by Tempo each lead on different measured dimensions — pick by the one that matters most to you.
Listed entry pricing: Shared Estimations (formerly Open Poker) at From $0/yr, Timesheets by Tempo at From $0/yr. See the plans table for what each tier includes.
Built only from the Atlassian Marketplace listing data shown on this page. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparisons. Read the methodology
Read each app's audit: Shared Estimations (formerly Open Poker) audit • Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking audit
| Field | Shared Estimations (formerly Open Poker) | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | |
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
| Keyword | Shared Estimations (formerly Open Poker) | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| form | #67 | Not ranked |
Neither Shared Estimations (formerly Open Poker) nor Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking lists a free plan. Shared Estimations (formerly Open Poker) lists no paid plan with a published price; Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking lists no paid plan with a published price. Prices are as listed on the Atlassian Marketplace; check what each tier includes in the Pricing section above.
Shared Estimations (formerly Open Poker) has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 9 reviews) compared to Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking (4.6★ from 298 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Shared Estimations (formerly Open Poker) holds the higher average rating (4.7★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly; Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has more published reviews to read for user-reported install experience (298 vs 9).
AppRanks cannot say which fits a larger or smaller operation — there is no store-size measurement in the Atlassian Marketplace data. What it can show: Shared Estimations (formerly Open Poker) has 9 published reviews; Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has 298 published reviews. Compare plan limits and pricing tiers against your own volume.
Migration support varies by app and category. Shared Estimations (formerly Open Poker) and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Shared Estimations (formerly Open Poker)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.