KARMA Page Builder for Confluence (Content Formatting) vs Instagram for Confluence

Instagram for Confluence edges out KARMA Page Builder for Confluence (Content Formatting) on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing entry tiers: KARMA Page Builder for Confluence (Content Formatting) at From $0/yr, Instagram for Confluence at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. KARMA Page Builder for Confluence (Content Formatting) has the larger user base (144 reviews vs 3), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Instagram for Confluence's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Instagram for Confluence; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — KARMA Page Builder for Confluence (Content Formatting)'s 144-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Instagram for Confluence's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Read each app's audit: KARMA Page Builder for Confluence (Content Formatting) audit • Instagram for Confluence audit

• Browse the atlassian compare hub
• Browse all atlassian apps
• Compare metrics glossary