Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Gliffy is the secure, intuitive technical diagramming tool fully integrated in Confluence. We're an Atlassian Platinum Top Vendor with over 18 million users—more than any other diagramming app in the Marketplace. Find out why with a free trial.
| KARMA Page Builder for Confluence (Content Formatting) | Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
From the creators of Aura & Mantra: The most intuitive page builder for Confluence. Knowledge Base, Teams, Documentation, Intranet & more
| Metric | KARMA Page Builder for Confluence (Content Formatting) | Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | 163 | ★ 799 |
| Active installs | 3,486+ | 16,249+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, KARMA Page Builder for Confluence (Content Formatting) is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.9★ vs Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: KARMA Page Builder for Confluence (Content Formatting) at From $0/yr, Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence has the larger user base (799 reviews vs 163), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. KARMA Page Builder for Confluence (Content Formatting)'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to KARMA Page Builder for Confluence (Content Formatting); mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence's 799-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than KARMA Page Builder for Confluence (Content Formatting)'s broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: KARMA Page Builder for Confluence (Content Formatting) audit • Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence audit
| — |
| Keyword | KARMA Page Builder for Confluence (Content Formatting) | Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| form | #56 | Not ranked |
Both KARMA Page Builder for Confluence (Content Formatting) and Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence offer paid plans only. KARMA Page Builder for Confluence (Content Formatting) starts at From $0/yr; Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
KARMA Page Builder for Confluence (Content Formatting) has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 163 reviews) compared to Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence (4.5★ from 799 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
KARMA Page Builder for Confluence (Content Formatting) holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence has the deeper published review base (799 vs 163), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
KARMA Page Builder for Confluence (Content Formatting) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (163 reviews). Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (799 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. KARMA Page Builder for Confluence (Content Formatting) and Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from KARMA Page Builder for Confluence (Content Formatting)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.