Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Aura is an app for Confluence which introduces an intuitive suite of content macros transforming boring pages into beautiful organized content. The intuitive usage & the beautiful results of Aura macros will boost user experience & user acceptance.
| AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence | PlantUML, Swagger, drawio.xml, Mermaid, Numbered Headings | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — |
Embed technical docs, diagrams, structured data, and formatted content in Confluence. Render from GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, URLs, attachments, or raw text using powerful macros to visualize code, models, specs, and markup - all in one flexible tool.
| Metric | AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence | PlantUML, Swagger, drawio.xml, Mermaid, Numbered Headings |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 211 | 35 |
| Active installs | 4,288+ | 3,300+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs PlantUML, Swagger, drawio.xml, Mermaid, Numbered Headings's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence at From $0/yr, PlantUML, Swagger, drawio.xml, Mermaid, Numbered Headings at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence has the larger user base (211 reviews vs 35), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. PlantUML, Swagger, drawio.xml, Mermaid, Numbered Headings's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — PlantUML, Swagger, drawio.xml, Mermaid, Numbered Headings's 35-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence audit • PlantUML, Swagger, drawio.xml, Mermaid, Numbered Headings audit
| — |
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence | PlantUML, Swagger, drawio.xml, Mermaid, Numbered Headings |
|---|---|---|
| form | #52 | #414 |
Both AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence and PlantUML, Swagger, drawio.xml, Mermaid, Numbered Headings offer paid plans only. AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence starts at From $0/yr; PlantUML, Swagger, drawio.xml, Mermaid, Numbered Headings starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 211 reviews) compared to PlantUML, Swagger, drawio.xml, Mermaid, Numbered Headings (4.0★ from 35 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence has the deeper published review base (211 vs 35), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (211 reviews). PlantUML, Swagger, drawio.xml, Mermaid, Numbered Headings typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (35 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence and PlantUML, Swagger, drawio.xml, Mermaid, Numbered Headings both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from PlantUML, Swagger, drawio.xml, Mermaid, Numbered Headings" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.