Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Aura is an app for Confluence which introduces an intuitive suite of content macros transforming boring pages into beautiful organized content. The intuitive usage & the beautiful results of Aura macros will boost user experience & user acceptance.
| AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence | Email This Issue | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — |
Mail collaboration made easy - send and receive e-mails with support for external users Send issues in emails to Jira or non-Jira recipients. Custom templates, event notifications and more. Receive emails with amazing features Jira does not have.
| Metric | AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence | Email This Issue |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.4 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 212 | 181 |
| Active installs | 4,266+ | 5,688+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ From $0/yr | From $1/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Email This Issue's 4.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence at From $0/yr, Email This Issue at From $1/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Email This Issue's 181-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence audit • Email This Issue audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence | Email This Issue |
|---|---|---|
| form | #52 | #236 |
Both AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence and Email This Issue offer paid plans only. AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence starts at From $0/yr; Email This Issue starts at From $1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 212 reviews) compared to Email This Issue (4.4★ from 181 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.4★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence has the deeper published review base (212 vs 181), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (212 reviews). Email This Issue typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (181 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. AURA Content Formatting Macros Tabs LaTeX HTML in Confluence and Email This Issue both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Email This Issue" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.