Side-by-side comparison
Portfolio & project management solution to view your work across any Jira projects and teams, all in one place.
Why pay separately for cost tracking, timelines, and portfolio-level updates? Choose budget-friendly Simple Portfolio Management for Jira instead. It includes the essential tools every project portfolio manager needs in a single, easy-to-use product.
| Metric | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | Simple Portfolio Management | SPM PPM PMO |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 ★ | 4.4 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 408 | 4 |
| Active installs | 12,974+ | 32+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $1/yr | ★ From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | — |
On the measured data here, Structure by Tempo leads on more dimensions (3 vs 1). Pick Simple Portfolio Management if one of the points where it leads is what you need.
Listed entry pricing: Structure by Tempo at From $1/yr, Simple Portfolio Management at From $0/yr. See the plans table for what each tier includes.
Built only from the Atlassian Marketplace listing data shown on this page. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparisons. Read the methodology
Read each app's audit: Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM audit • Simple Portfolio Management | SPM PPM PMO audit
| Field | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | Simple Portfolio Management | SPM PPM PMO |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
| 6 tiers |
| Listed features | — | 3 |
|---|
No features listed.
No tracked changes.
No description available.
Simple Portfolio Management | SPM PPM PMO is cheaper to start with — it offers a free plan and Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM doesn't list one. Prices are as listed on the Atlassian Marketplace; check what each tier includes in the Pricing section above.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 408 reviews) compared to Simple Portfolio Management | SPM PPM PMO (4.4★ from 4 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 4.4★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly; Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has more published reviews to read for user-reported install experience (408 vs 4).
AppRanks cannot say which fits a larger or smaller operation — there is no store-size measurement in the Atlassian Marketplace data. What it can show: Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has 408 published reviews; Simple Portfolio Management | SPM PPM PMO has 4 published reviews. Compare plan limits and pricing tiers against your own volume.
Migration support varies by app and category. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and Simple Portfolio Management | SPM PPM PMO both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Simple Portfolio Management | SPM PPM PMO" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.