Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Portfolio & project management solution to view your work across any Jira projects and teams, all in one place.
| Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | Threaded Comments | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | Threaded Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 ★ | 3.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 408 | 37 |
| Active installs | 13,025+ | 226+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $1/yr | ★ From $0.38/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.5★ vs Threaded Comments's 3.9★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing differs significantly: Threaded Comments at From $0.38/yr vs Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM at From $1/yr (Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM is roughly 2.6x the entry-tier cost of Threaded Comments). The pricier tier typically signals deeper feature coverage or higher capacity ceilings; confirm the gap matches your actual feature requirements before treating cost as the deciding factor.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the larger user base (408 reviews vs 37), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Threaded Comments's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Threaded Comments's 37-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM audit • Threaded Comments audit
Both Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and Threaded Comments offer paid plans only. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM starts at From $1/yr; Threaded Comments starts at From $0.38/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 408 reviews) compared to Threaded Comments (3.9★ from 37 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 3.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the deeper published review base (408 vs 37), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (408 reviews). Threaded Comments typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (37 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and Threaded Comments both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Threaded Comments" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.