Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Portfolio & project management solution to view your work across any Jira projects and teams, all in one place.
| Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | Behave Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Regain time for your agile software teams by developing and testing in a truly agile way: BDD to easily capture user story conversations, and Git integration of feature files ready for automated acceptance tests in Cucumber – all in one package
| Metric | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | Behave Pro: BDD in Jira with Cucumber |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 ★ | 4.4 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 408 | 45 |
| Active installs | 12,974+ | 279+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $1/yr | From $1/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM edges out Behave Pro: BDD in Jira with Cucumber on rating (4.5★ vs 4.4★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing sits in similar territory: Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM at From $1/yr, Behave Pro: BDD in Jira with Cucumber at From $1/yr (within ~25% of each other on the entry tier). At this overlap, total cost of ownership comes from how per-tier capacity gates align with your order volume — confirm both apps' upgrade triggers against your projected scale before deciding.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the larger user base (408 reviews vs 45), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Behave Pro: BDD in Jira with Cucumber's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Behave Pro: BDD in Jira with Cucumber's 45-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM audit • Behave Pro: BDD in Jira with Cucumber audit
| Keyword | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | Behave Pro |
|---|---|---|
| forms | Not ranked | #153 |
| form | Not ranked | #261 |
Both Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and Behave Pro: BDD in Jira with Cucumber offer paid plans only. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM starts at From $1/yr; Behave Pro: BDD in Jira with Cucumber starts at From $1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 408 reviews) compared to Behave Pro: BDD in Jira with Cucumber (4.4★ from 45 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 4.4★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the deeper published review base (408 vs 45), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (408 reviews). Behave Pro: BDD in Jira with Cucumber typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (45 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and Behave Pro: BDD in Jira with Cucumber both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Behave Pro: BDD in Jira with Cucumber" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.