Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM vs Easy Forms for Confluence

Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points

Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM

3.6·401reviews·14,064+installs

Jira Project Portfolio Management (PPM): Manage projects & team capacity in excel spreadsheet-like tables with advanced hierarchy

Shopify

Change

1. Listing metadata

Field-level data

	Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM	Easy Forms for Confluence
Tagline	“Jira Project Portfolio Management (PPM): Manage projects & team capacity in excel spreadsheet-like tables with advanced hierarchy”129 chars	“Easy Forms lets you create forms within a Confluence page by simple drag and drop controls. Viewing and exporting form submissions is equally simple.”149 chars
Description	129 / 5000 chars3% used	149 / 5000 chars3% used
Screenshots	—	—
Languages
Platforms	Shopify	Shopify
Developer	Tempo Software	Appfire
Listed	—	—
Last updated	—	—

4. Categories & rankings

Feature comparison between Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and Easy Forms for Confluence
Metric	Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM	Easy Forms for Confluence
Rating	★ 3.6 ★	3.0 ★
Total reviews	★ 401	20
Active installs	14,064+	292+
Free plan	—	—
Built for Shopify	—	—

AppRanks verdict

Generated from live data on this page

Based on the data on this page, Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace merchants — 3.6★ vs Easy Forms for Confluence's 3.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the larger user base (401 reviews vs 20), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Easy Forms for Confluence's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Easy Forms for Confluence's 20-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Read each app's audit: Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM audit • Easy Forms for Confluence audit

Keyword	Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM	Easy Forms for Confluence
form	Not ranked	#5
forms	Not ranked	#5

Frequently asked

Common questions about this comparison

Which has better reviews, Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM or Easy Forms for Confluence?

Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the higher average rating (3.6★ from 401 reviews) compared to Easy Forms for Confluence (3.0★ from 20 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM or Easy Forms for Confluence?

It depends on what you're optimizing for. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Easy Forms for Confluence is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM or Easy Forms for Confluence?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace marketplace. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has more onboarding documentation maturity (401 reviews vs 20), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace stores?

Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (401 reviews). Easy Forms for Confluence aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (20 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and Easy Forms for Confluence?

Migration support varies by app and category. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and Easy Forms for Confluence both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Easy Forms for Confluence" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.

Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM vs Easy Forms for Confluence

Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM

1. Listing metadata

4. Categories & rankings

Easy Forms for Confluence

At a glance