Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Portfolio & project management solution to view your work across any Jira projects and teams, all in one place.
| Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | Aha! Roadmaps for Jira | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Aha! is the world's #1 product roadmap software. Do your product planning in Aha! and push features to Jira. Get updates in real-time. Integrate for free to get your product mojo back (works with On-demand and On-prem). You need a paid Aha! account.
| Metric | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | Aha! Roadmaps for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 406 | 357 |
| Active installs | 13,621+ | 1,701+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $1/yr | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | — |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Featured placements | 1 | — |
Based on the data on this page, Aha! Roadmaps for Jira is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace merchants — 4.9★ vs Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Aha! Roadmaps for Jira; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM's 406-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Aha! Roadmaps for Jira's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM audit • Aha! Roadmaps for Jira audit
Not featured in any section recently.
Aha! Roadmaps for Jira has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 357 reviews) compared to Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM (4.5★ from 406 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Aha! Roadmaps for Jira is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace marketplace. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has more onboarding documentation maturity (406 reviews vs 357), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (406 reviews). Aha! Roadmaps for Jira aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (357 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and Aha! Roadmaps for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Aha! Roadmaps for Jira" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.