Gantt Cloud vs Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM

Based on the data on this page, Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.5★ vs Gantt Cloud's 3.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing differs significantly: Gantt Cloud at From $0.25/yr vs Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM at From $1/yr (Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM is roughly 4.0x the entry-tier cost of Gantt Cloud). The pricier tier typically signals deeper feature coverage or higher capacity ceilings; confirm the gap matches your actual feature requirements before treating cost as the deciding factor.

Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the larger user base (408 reviews vs 85), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Gantt Cloud's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Gantt Cloud's 85-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM or Gantt Cloud cheaper?

Both Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and Gantt Cloud offer paid plans only. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM starts at From $1/yr; Gantt Cloud starts at From $0.25/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM or Gantt Cloud?

Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 408 reviews) compared to Gantt Cloud (3.0★ from 85 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM or Gantt Cloud?

Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 3.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM or Gantt Cloud?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the deeper published review base (408 vs 85), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (408 reviews). Gantt Cloud typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (85 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.